This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Choosing the best processor for PC gaming is a rather more complex proposition than information technology seems at first glance. Afterward all, "best" is not a single metric. The simplest manner for us to help you decide would be to link our Core i7-8700K (Run into on Amazon) review and leave a two-word caption: "This one." Only simply picking the most expensive and/or fastest processor a company offers for consumer desktop PCs, without whatever coherent rationale behind the option, ultimately wouldn't respond the question.

The truth is Intel and AMD offering a fairly broad range of CPUs at dissimilar price points, clock speeds, and capabilities. "All-time," for our purposes, is not defined solely as "fastest," but contains some performance-per-dollar weighting as well. This is especially true in games, which oftentimes don't scale well above iv cores and most never take reward of Hyper-Threading. And every bit for AMD, the visitor'southward Ryzen architecture, which debuted in March of this yr, is worth serious consideration. Permit'south pause down our favorite choices for each company.

Intel: The Core i5-8400

Intel's Core i5-8400 (Run into on Amazon) is a half dozen-core bit with a base frequency of 2.8GHz, a maximum turbo boost of 4GHz, and a graceful $180 price tag. While we haven't reviewed the Core i5-8400 ourselves, both TechSpot and Anandtech have investigated its gaming performance and institute it keeps upwardly very well with its higher-finish siblings, peculiarly as resolutions hitting 1440p and above. Information technology even outperforms the Core i7-8700K in AT's Rise of the Tomb Raider tests, mayhap considering the 8700K has Hyper-Threading enabled. A game running slower on an HT-enabled system is unusual, but non unheard of.

Core i5-8400

The Core i5-8400 has several specific features to recommend it. Very few games today scale up across four cores and four threads, because that's where the mainstream PC market has topped out these last half dozen years. Now that Intel is pushing six-core fries at much lower prices, that will showtime to modify, but the six-core Cadre i5-8400 is ready for that shift. Those same six cores will adroitly address any non-gaming requirements you might put on information technology, and provide enough horsepower for some game streaming or recording if you want to do and then.

AMD: The Ryzen 5 1600 or 1600X

I'thou taking a slightly different tack with AMD. The two chips I'd recommend are the Ryzen 5 1600 (Come across on Amazon) for $219, or the Ryzen 5 1600X (Run into on Amazon) for $249. The only difference between the two are their base clocks and heave clocks — the Ryzen 5 1600 runs at 3.2GHz/3.6GHz, while the 1600X runs at 3.6GHz/4GHz.

I'd recommend the Ryzen five 1600 over the 1600X based on the benchmark results available online. Just as at that place's very little divergence between the Core i5-8400 and the i7-8700K, in that location'due south not much of a gap between the ii AMD fries, either. The difference, however, is that if you're withal gaming at 1080p, Ryzen CPUs tend to fall behind their Intel counterparts (this gap vanishes as you scale up game resolutions). Information technology is possible in some titles, the 1600X'southward higher turbo clock volition yield genuine benefits. We don't take data for the Ryzen 5 1600, but the 1600X is shown below. Its relatively high clocks brand it an fantabulous performer, and it hangs well against the more than-expensive Ryzen 7 1800X:

Both of these chips are six-core, 12-thread CPUs, and both hitting AMD's sugariness spot every bit far as cost/performance.

As for whether you should buy Intel or AMD, if we're strictly talking gaming, I have to give the nod to the Core i5-8400, which is less expensive than either AMD chip. But if you're an AMD fan, at that place's genuinely practiced news: Different the company'south old Piledriver processors, Ryzen competes well with Intel, especially if you lot widen the comparison to include other types of applications. They may non take the peak nod for all-time bang for your cadet in gaming, specifically, but they're far more competitive than any product AMD has had in-market for at least a half-decade. And if y'all're gaming at 1440p or 4K, you won't discover the departure.